My musings are about
monogamous Christian marriage in Britain and not inclusive of any other
religion as they differ greatly, some allowing various partners.
It wasn’t until the second
century (about 110) that bishop Ignatius of Antioch wrote to bishop Polycarp of
Smyrna:
"It becomes both men and women who marry, to form their union
with the approval of the bishop, that their marriage may be according to God,
and not after their own lust.”
So the whole idea of a marriage
ceremony being connected with the Christian religion doesn't seem to have been
the case in the first century church. It
wasn’t until the 16th century that parental consent along with
consent from the church became a necessary requirement. Nowadays parental consent is only needed when
one or both parties are under the marital age stipulated by law.
Divorce has been around as long as
marriage. Originally, it was enough for
a man to state that he divorced his wife for it to be so. In Old Testament times, it was not considered
to be God’s will but little was actually done about it as it was such a common
practice. Jesus did speak against
divorce saying that it was not what God had intended but also recognised the
fact that life doesn’t always go according to plan. After the 10th century however,
marriage was not available in this country until a few centuries later and then
only for men of sufficient wealth to pay for the very expensive act of
parliament required to grant the divorce. It wasn’t until the middle of the 19th
century that divorce was open to ordinary people. It was still difficult for women to apply for
a divorce as they not only had to prove adultery of the husband but also other
serious problems such as rape, incest or cruelty. It is a recognised fact that divorce is more
common now than ever before but this is probably in part to the laws being
changed and the fact that both men and women can apply on equal terms.
Family life is no longer
so straight forward. Marriage for life
is still the hope for Christians but circumstances can change until sometimes
to continue in the marriage can become intolerable. I was quite taken aback and upset only a few
months ago when a relative said that she felt she was unable to share on a
social network, photos of her son’s recent marriage as both he and his new wife
were both divorcees and most of their congregation disapproved of this. This is not
the case in many congregations but it is a sad reflection on the church as a
whole (whatever any individual opinion may be) that those who are not part of the
church construct feel that it is judgmental, exclusive and unwelcoming. Those who are Christian and divorced are
sometimes made to feel guilty of their past and unaccepted within the life of
the church. They mention their marital
status in rather apologetic terms. Life
happens! I’m sure God’s love reaches out
to those who find themselves in such situations – maybe more so as they have need
of some tender loving care.
While I still accept that
marriage for life is the best thing, I acknowledge that often this is not what
many experience. Should someone who has
made a mistake in their choice of marriage partner be condemned to pay for it
for the rest of their lives? Are they
not entitled to find happiness and love because of some past mistake? I have come across many who remain
desperately unhappy in their marriage out of a sense of duty as a Christian and
so feel necessity of ‘staying together’.
Surely if about half (45% in 2009 as mentioned before) of the adult
married population are divorced then the church needs to be more relevant to
the needs of people in the situations in which they find themselves today. Maybe
a little more tolerance, understanding, inclusive attitudes and a good dollop
of mercy will help to show people that God does care about what happens in
their lives.
I must apologise for the way which this post looks. I wrote as normal but for some strange reason it has come out in white blocks!
I must apologise for the way which this post looks. I wrote as normal but for some strange reason it has come out in white blocks!


4 comments:
I agree on the need for sensitivity, I also think there is a big need for counselling. People shouldn't need to feel guilty forever over a mistake, there is a need in our communities to let people move on. While I don't advocate staying with an abusive spouse, I think people today need to know that it is possible to work though situations and come out stronger and just as much, if not more so, in love than before.
Yes, I totally agree. Sometimes people give up at the first hurdle when they could work through it but similarly people stay when a situation cannot be repaired.
Interested in the stats from 2004. I read that when Jesus spoke about divorce he wasn't making a statement but answering a question. The Jews had stoning for adultery officially but had moderated it to divorce and Jesus endorses that. He never mentions divorce for neglect and abuse which was taken for granted. Apparently there was a big debate going on whether the Jews should adopt the Roman idea of "any reason" divorce - ie our no blame mutual agreement. It's that which he says is completely not on. The phrase you shall not divorce for any reason has been taken on by the literalistic fundamentalists to mean something it was never intended to say and been used as a stick to beat the very people that divorce should be there to protect :-(
Thanks Liz for that information - very interesting.
Post a Comment