Some points of faith are
never up for negotiation, like the belief that Jesus is the Son of God and that
through His death and resurrection we can enjoy eternal life in God’s
presence. But there are some practices
and culture changes that have occurred as humanity has progressed through the
centuries – e.g. we no longer accept slavery as a way of life or burn people at
the stake as witches because they use herbal remedies. These practices we consider to be part of the
‘Dark Ages’. And so today I think that
there are issues that we should address and not remain with a dinosaur
mentality. I have been rethinking a
number of such issues and hope to share my thoughts over the coming days/weeks.
We have heard much in
the media lately about same-sex marriage and the whole sexuality issue. I have looked at Bible-based arguments of
Christians against homosexuality and have found that there are also verses which
the pro-gay lobby also quotes in their
favour. It seems that whatever your
stance, you will probably find some Biblical verse to support your claims. Most people will quote Leviticus – the Jewish
book of Law and Practice. But Paul in Galatians
says that we are no longer under the law but under the grace of God. So my first question was – as a Christian, am
I bound by the Jewish Law as it is written in Leviticus? Other parts of the book we easily disregard
but hold onto these verses about sexuality.
On the other hand, research
has been carried out over several decades in various countries and the conclusion
is that most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual
orientation. And I keep going back to
the verse in Matthew 19v12 where Jesus Himself, when talking about marriage,
says, ‘For some are eunuchs because they were born that way, others were made
that way by men … … ‘ Does that mean
that some are born castrated or that they are born not being attracted to the
opposite sex? Would such people today be
classed as gay/lesbian? Yet Jesus
accepts that this is a reality, some people just are that way inclined.
In the church of the 1st
century, Philip was told by God to go to the desert road where he encountered
an Ethiopian eunuch who was reading the book of Isaiah, searching for
truth. Philip explained to him about
Jesus and the eunuch was baptised.
Philip never questioned the man’s sexuality and as the directive came
from God it is clear that God accepted him as he was. Here was someone who would never be able to
become heterosexual, no matter how much prayer and re-education he may receive
(as many Christians believe is the answer nowadays) yet God cared for him and
sent Philip to show him the way and baptise him, while still being a eunuch.
I have recently read a
very well-written article by Steve Chalke (for the non-British he is a very
well respected church leader) where he talks about the debate of the moment of
same-sex marriage. He says,
I'm worried that the noise of the arguments around gay marriage
will cloud and confuse the real question for the Church, which is about the
nature of inclusion. I am convinced that it is only as the Christian community
grapples with this that we will find wise answers, not only regarding gay
marriage, but also to related questions around the Church's wider attitude to
gay people.
(You can read the full article here.)
Time and time again
Jesus says and shows by his actions that His message is an all-inclusive
gospel. If we are to be brutally honest
with ourselves, gay and lesbian people on the whole are not accepted in Christian circles.
We may accept them – on our terms but not as they are –
unlike Philip in the book of Acts. It is
not our place to judge – that is God’s prerogative. As Christians we are simply told to spread
the gospel message, the rest is up to God.
Jesus died for all, regardless of sexual orientation. He understood that some are that way inclined
and said so. So it seems to me that it
is because I am a follower of Jesus
that I should treat all with the same inclusive attitude and not exclude them
from the kingdom where only God is judge. 
6 comments:
I really like how you've expressed yourself here Mavis. Very sensitive and wise. My jury is still out on some aspects of the debate but I'm categorically anti homophobic behaviour. I don't like people being treated differently or less than human for any reason. Actually I don't really want to know that someone is gay. Apart from a wedding ring we don't generally broadcast our sexuality in public. I don't really want to know about the private life of my work colleagues for example and if they do confide in me I don't want to treat them any differently cos of what I know about them.
Thanks for your comments Liz. I can't say that I'm definitely for or against. I just think that, like you, it's not my place to question. God is quite capable of convicting them of any sin as He does with me. And I'm passionate about the gospel being all-inclusive. God loves ALL of His creation and at some point we all fall short. It's just that for some Christians it seems that 'sexual sins' are the worst kind!?
They definitely have their place in the lists, but so do uncontrolled anger, gossip, adultery and all the rest. We can't pick and chose just cos we're more personally revolted by some than others. And who do we think we are to judge ? I may have been spared doing any of the biggies but when we stand in front of the Judge I know I'll only get through by grace not by being niceish most of the time (cos a lot of that is selfish to stop life being un-nice anyway). I looked up the word sin - old english archery word for an arrow that flopped on the ground and didn't even get as far as the target. It's one thing exercising right judgement but quite another being judgmental.
Totally agree Liz. I like the original meaning of sin - pictures it well.
With you on this issue Mavis and Liz. It's about time we stopped throwing hurtful words at people due to their sexual orientation and started loving them and sharing God's love period!
I agree Joanna.
Post a Comment